12/09/08

Thoughts about Religion



I live in a society where all the major religions in the world have its presence. This enabled me to have a broader vision about religion and reach beyond its narrow frame. But what happens in Kandhmal (Orissa) in the name of religion make me think 'why religion'?

India is one of the few countries where there is no official religion - thanks to the enlightened view of the architechts of our constitution. If go by statitics, India has all the 'right' to be a Hindu state. But this land allows even certain special rights to minority communities in the area of education and minority interests are well guarded in the constitution. Until politics came into the scene, Hindus never were concerned of religious conversion or any activities of minority community.

When politics reared its ugly head, things got much worse. Politicians treat people as mere vote bank and religious leaders use them for their selfish motives. Politics and religion make strange bed fellows and together it exploit the ignorance of the mass. Religion is something so deeply rooted in Indian psyche, so people are quite 'vulnerable' in this regard.

All religions are responsible for the clashes in the name of religion. Probably it is the caste system and poverty that pushes many hindus to the fold of other religions that promise equality (but that is not true, a lower caste hindu converted to christianity remain a lower caste christain all his/her life – the complex indian social system is to be blamed for this).
Now with their political wing, hindus feel the need to protect religion and act against religious conversions. And it is not only Hindus who fight in Kandhmal, Christians also fight with the help of Maoists (what an irony, join hand with atheists in the name of religion). It is totally wrong to depict India as a place where minorities are not safe as certain western medias do.

I am against proselytism, it is just taking advantage of one's disadvantage. At the same time it would be nice if the protectors of religion have an insight about our society. So atleast they can find an answer to why conversions happens. Probably then they can turn their destructive energy to constructive one. That would contribute to the upliftment of underprivileged class. So conversions can be stopped forever.

Besides, I feel the mass should be educated against being used in the name of religion and politics. They must be taught to be compassionate and tolerant. After all religion is to purify oneself, not to fight with each other.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

In the name of religion...
I agree with you that many crimes and injustices are made in the name of religions. Personally I think that politics and religion have many things in common. For instance, to persuade the others about some thoughs or personal opinions, no matter how. Religions are based in self-perpetuation and have created rules and traditions to exclude intelectual discussion. Religion says that it can not be analyzed by science, but this is not true. Religion, as every human cultural product, can be analyzed, and if the conclusion obtained by scientific research is that religions are just self-perpetuation systems not based in any reality, then they should be discarded and not teached any more.
This though can look radical now, but I am convinced that in 500 years science will show the meaningless of religion for the modern society and religion will be teached in the Universities like an interesting property of human psichology, but without relevance to understand the real word and the meaning of our existence.